September 2026 review · rank 8 of 10
Humbot AI detector test results
In the September 2026 HumanizerEval review, Humbot ranked 8 of 10 with a mean strict-bypass rate of 66.4%, behind StealthGPT Super at 96.8%. It cleared all 5 detectors on 0 of 50 texts. Review our full results for the best AI humanizer on the leaderboard page.
Humbot results, September 2026
- Website
- humbot.ai
- Rank
- 8 of 10
- 66.4%
- 0 of 50
- 0 of 50 (0%), mean 1.4%, median 0%
- 31 of 50 (62%), mean 60.8%, median 83.18%
- 35 of 50 (70%), mean 69.1%, median 72.15%
- 50 of 50 (100%), mean 96.7%, median 100%
- 50 of 50 (100%), mean 97.4%, median 99.71%
- 22%
- 0%
- 98%
- 70%
- 1.12
- 0
- 0
- Advanced
Recompute any of this from scores.csv. Strict bypass means an overall human verdict on a human score above 50%.
What the vendor claims, and what we measured
- Claim
- “Our advanced algorithms rewrite AI-generated text to mimic natural human patterns, ensuring your content passes even the strictest AI detectors like Turnitin, Originality.ai, GPTZero, ZeroGPT and Copyleaks.” (humbot.ai , retrieved October 1, 2026) A separate line says Humbot empowers you to verify your work against Originality.ai, ZeroGPT, Turnitin, and GPTZero. That line does not state a bypass rate.
- Measured
- Strict bypass in September 2026: Pangram 0%, GPTZero 62%, Originality.ai 70%, ZeroGPT 100%, Winston AI 100%.
- Verdict
- Not verified. No bypass rate is stated. In September 2026, strict bypass on the named detectors in this panel was Originality.ai 70%, GPTZero 62% and ZeroGPT 100%. Named detectors count as passed at 90% or above. Turnitin and Copyleaks are not in this panel.
Review history
| Review | Rank | Mean bypass | Pangram | GPTZero | Originality.ai | ZeroGPT | Winston AI | Naturalness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| September 2026 | 8 of 10 | 66.4% | 0% | 62% | 70% | 100% | 100% | 0% |
Head to head
Because every tool saw the same texts, these pages report per-sample agreement, how often each tool bypassed detection on the same input, rather than a difference of averages.
Humbot vs StealthGPT
Humbot cleared all 5 detectors on 0 samples where StealthGPT did not; the reverse happened on 46. Both cleared 0.
Humbot vs WriteHuman
Humbot cleared all 5 detectors on 0 samples where WriteHuman did not; the reverse happened on 32. Both cleared 0.
Humbot vs Grubby
Humbot cleared all 5 detectors on 0 samples where Grubby did not; the reverse happened on 18. Both cleared 0.
Humbot vs Rephrasy
Humbot cleared all 5 detectors on 0 samples where Rephrasy did not; the reverse happened on 20. Both cleared 0.
Humbot vs Undetectable.ai
Humbot cleared all 5 detectors on 0 samples where Undetectable.ai did not; the reverse happened on 15. Both cleared 0.
Humbot vs RewriteAI
Humbot cleared all 5 detectors on 0 samples where RewriteAI did not; the reverse happened on 13. Both cleared 0.
Humbot vs HIX Bypass
Humbot cleared all 5 detectors on 0 samples where HIX Bypass did not; the reverse happened on 1. Both cleared 0.
Humbot vs BypassGPT
Humbot cleared all 5 detectors on 0 samples where BypassGPT did not; the reverse never happened. Both cleared 0.
Humbot vs Ryne
Humbot cleared all 5 detectors on 0 samples where Ryne did not; the reverse never happened. Both cleared 0.
Humbot FAQ
Does Humbot work?
No, it does not reliably bypass Pangram. In the September 2026 HumanizerEval review it passed Pangram on 0%, GPTZero on 62%, Originality.ai on 70%, ZeroGPT on 100%, Winston AI on 100% of texts. Its mean bypass was 66.4%, rank 8 of 10.
Does Humbot change the meaning of the text?
Yes. In September 2026, 22% of its outputs passed the factual-consistency check and 70% passed stance preservation.
Does Humbot make text longer?
Yes. Its outputs averaged 12% longer than the input in September 2026 (ratio 1.12). No sample crossed the 1.4× inflation or 0.6× deflation threshold.