September 2026 review

AI humanizers tested

10 tools, each run on the same 50 English texts on its strongest advertised setting. Each profile carries the current-review numbers, the settings and plan tier used, the review-by-review history, and the tool’s own marketing claim set against what we measured.

AI humanizer comparison, September 2026. Sorted by the mean strict-bypass rate across the 5 detectors. Every tool rewrote the same 50 texts, and every output went to every detector.
#HumanizerPangramGPTZeroOriginality.aiZeroGPTWinston AI
1StealthGPTPassed all 5 detectors on 46 of 5096.8%92%98%98%98%98%83.5%1.04
2WriteHumanPassed all 5 detectors on 32 of 4992.7%65%100%98%100%100%58.7%1.02
3GrubbyPassed all 5 detectors on 18 of 5085.6%36%94%98%100%100%77.5%1.11
4RephrasyPassed all 5 detectors on 20 of 5084.0%46%88%86%100%100%54.5%1.13
5Undetectable.aiPassed all 5 detectors on 15 of 5084.0%32%96%94%100%98%56.5%1.21
6RewriteAIPassed all 5 detectors on 13 of 5077.2%28%86%88%88%96%72.0%1.09
7HIX BypassPassed all 5 detectors on 1 of 5066.4%2%68%64%100%98%46.5%1.11
8HumbotPassed all 5 detectors on 0 of 5066.4%0%62%70%100%100%47.5%1.12
9BypassGPTPassed all 5 detectors on 0 of 5064.4%0%56%66%100%100%49.0%1.12
10RynePassed all 5 detectors on 0 of 5023.6%22%8%0%62%26%79.0%1.07

Each column counts how many of the 50 texts that detector called human-written. Rank is the average of the five columns. WriteHuman returned 49 of 50 outputs, so its rates are out of 49. Full methodology.

Profiles